Support the troops? Ha!

Well, I just learned that the Bush Administration, the purveyors of all that is good and American, has decided that the troops don’t need no stinking raise.

Troops don’t need bigger pay raises, White House budget officials said Wednesday in a statement of administration policy laying out objections to the House version of the 2008 defense authorization bill.

Noooo, because it’s their duty to God and George to enlist and go fight for whatever it is they’re fighting for this week. And dammit, they get paid well enough as it is! At least they have jobs! They should be thankful that they’re allowed to make these kinds of sacrifices!

Bush actually asked to 3% pay raises for our folks in uniform initially. But then someone went against the grain and thought the troops should get more. Feh!

The Bush administration had asked for a 3 percent military raise for Jan. 1, 2008, enough to match last year’s average pay increase in the private sector. The House Armed Services Committee recommends a 3.5 percent pay increase for 2008, and increases in 2009 through 2012 that also are 0.5 percentage point greater than private-sector pay raises.

The slightly bigger military raises are intended to reduce the gap between military and civilian pay that stands at about 3.9 percent today. Under the bill, HR 1585, the pay gap would be reduced to 1.4 percent after the Jan. 1, 2012, pay increase.

Bush budget officials said the administration “strongly opposes” both the 3.5 percent raise for 2008 and the follow-on increases, calling extra pay increases “unnecessary.”[empahsis added]

Why exactly shouldn’t the lowly Army mechanic get as much, if not more, money for his job than the mechanic up the street? Afterall, the Army mechanic isn’t exactly playing beach volleyball over there. He’s giving up his civilian life and liberty to “fight them there so we don’t have to fight them here”, but he’s not worth a couple more dollars a month?

Don’t worry. It gets better.

A death gratuity for federal civilian employees who die in support of military operations, and new benefits for disabled retirees and the survivors of military retirees also drew complaints.

This includes the transfer of the GI Bill benefits program for reservists from the Department of Defense to the Department of Veterans Affairs, a step that GI Bill supporters said is needed to set the stage for increases in reserve benefits that have been kept low by the military because it views the program as a retention incentive rather than a post-service education program.

Refusal by lawmakers to approve Tricare fees for beneficiaries, something administration officials view as an important step in holding down health care cost, also drew opposition, along with a provision imposing price controls on prescription drugs dispensed to Tricare users.[emphasis mine again]

Related posts:

  1. Bush wants to increase Health Savings Accounts
  2. Bush caught red-faced again
  3. Oh, you just wait!
  4. Yahoo! News – Admissions of Bush Plot May Not Make Trial
  5. Cheney on “Idol”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
This blog is protected by Dave\'s Spam Karma 2: 400 Spams eaten and counting...

Bad Behavior has blocked 406 access attempts in the last 7 days.