First of all, I have to thank Joe for putting me on to the site “Sweet Jesus, I hate Bill O’Reilly“. He did it unintentionally, but it’s still all his fault, so thanks, Joe. Now, let’s get down to business.
Bill O’Reilly is a schmuck of the highest order. I determined this before I even started blogging, because he likes to call himself “fair” but honestly…The man is flippin’ unhinged. And over the course of 3-4 years my distaste for the egotistical idiot has grown by leaps and bounds. Of course, the best thing to come out of my feelings for Satan’s helper Bill was when my aunt-in-law tried to give me his latest book. By gods, the laugh I had out of that. She, unfortunately, didn’t get it- being one of those that thinks Jesus speaks in Bill’s ear and all (“He tells it like it is!”). Oh, stop me now. That’s a damned good memory. Ok, moving on.
SJIHBO (as I will now call it) has a YouTube of Bill and Kirk Cameron discussing Kirk’s (at the time) upcoming debate with atheists.
Now, I’m not going to tell you to go watch it (especially if Bill makes you queasy). However, I’m providing the video just in case you don’t believe that they’ve said what I claim they said. Googling, I know, is sometimes very difficult. Also, in the interest of full disclosure I must remind (and perhaps inform) folks that I am a practicing polytheistic solitary Pagan. This, contrary to what Anthrax Coulter will have you believe, does not mean that I’m an atheist. Nor does this mean I am a Wiccan. Please keep that in mind.
Ok, back to the vid. Kirk is trying to tell Bill why evolution is bullshit. To illustrate his point he says “Look at the camera lens. It was designed by someone. And the human eyeball has (however many) lenses in it….blah, blah, blah”* Now, if you watch the video (I’m sure there’s YouTube somewhere of Kirk on Nightline, but I don’t really want to see it) you’ll see how Kirk insinuates that someone designed the camera and POP it was there. False analogy, Kirk. Unless you’re explaining my Pagan beliefs, which would then make the analogy apt.
His argument is that man designs things which proves, because of man’s complexity, that God created man. But he forgot that it wasn’t just one man that designed that camera, nor was it just one man that put it all together. Different people designed different parts of that camera and then more different people put that bad boy together so that it would work as intended. Yes, it’s probably possible that one person designed every single part of that camera, but that’s not how it happened. This leads me to understand that Kirk believes that many gods worked in concert to design the human form, and therefore Kirk Cameron is a polytheistic Pagan.
Interspersed with Kirk’s proclamation of Paganism (I’m so proud) is Bill telling Kirk how he had Richard Dawkins on and they debated The Big Bang Theory. Bill proudly announces that he won because he told this dude “You cannot explain to me how the world, the Earth, got here. You don’t have it. You can blather all day long, but you don’t have it.” So, he was debating a theory that says BANG! The Earth is here** and saying that it can’t be proven and yet he states as fact that God created the earth basically like this: BAM! The Earth is here. Do you see the difference there? Yeah, his way is BAM and the other way is BANG. Way to put that guy in his place, Bill! You are the man.
But let’s go back to Kirk.
“Darwin said in order to prove evolution, which is the number one alternative to God, you have to be able to prove transitional forms- one animal transitioning into another. And all through the fossil record and life we don’t find one of these:….”
Here my new buddy Kirk holds up a picture of:
A Crocoduck
All the while he’s declaring “There is no one animal transitioning into another.” (I will refrain from pointing out obvious one very obvious example of evolution just because Kirk and I are so united here).
Oh, Kirk, Kirk, you were doing so well. I just have one question for you, dear guy:
What is this?
Note to Bill: Declaring that someone cannot prove to you that the world just appeared out of nowhere (huh?) does not make you a debate winner. Sorry, old man. You still suck.
* Did I mention I suck at transcription? Yeah, I do. I might look up a transcript later, though.
** Very simplistic, I realize. But I hate science. OK?
Bill sucks and Kirk is a Pagan
First of all, I have to thank Joe for putting me on to the site “Sweet Jesus, I hate Bill O’Reilly“. He did it unintentionally, but it’s still all his fault, so thanks, Joe. Now, let’s get down to business.
Bill O’Reilly is a schmuck of the highest order. I determined this before I even started blogging, because he likes to call himself “fair” but honestly…The man is flippin’ unhinged. And over the course of 3-4 years my distaste for the egotistical idiot has grown by leaps and bounds. Of course, the best thing to come out of my feelings for
Satan’s helperBill was when my aunt-in-law tried to give me his latest book. By gods, the laugh I had out of that. She, unfortunately, didn’t get it- being one of those that thinks Jesus speaks in Bill’s ear and all (“He tells it like it is!”). Oh, stop me now. That’s a damned good memory. Ok, moving on.SJIHBO (as I will now call it) has a YouTube of Bill and Kirk Cameron discussing Kirk’s (at the time) upcoming debate with atheists.
Now, I’m not going to tell you to go watch it (especially if Bill makes you queasy). However, I’m providing the video just in case you don’t believe that they’ve said what I claim they said. Googling, I know, is sometimes very difficult. Also, in the interest of full disclosure I must remind (and perhaps inform) folks that I am a practicing polytheistic solitary Pagan. This, contrary to what Anthrax Coulter will have you believe, does not mean that I’m an atheist. Nor does this mean I am a Wiccan. Please keep that in mind.
Ok, back to the vid. Kirk is trying to tell Bill why evolution is bullshit. To illustrate his point he says “Look at the camera lens. It was designed by someone. And the human eyeball has (however many) lenses in it….blah, blah, blah”* Now, if you watch the video (I’m sure there’s YouTube somewhere of Kirk on Nightline, but I don’t really want to see it) you’ll see how Kirk insinuates that someone designed the camera and POP it was there. False analogy, Kirk. Unless you’re explaining my Pagan beliefs, which would then make the analogy apt.
His argument is that man designs things which proves, because of man’s complexity, that God created man. But he forgot that it wasn’t just one man that designed that camera, nor was it just one man that put it all together. Different people designed different parts of that camera and then more different people put that bad boy together so that it would work as intended. Yes, it’s probably possible that one person designed every single part of that camera, but that’s not how it happened. This leads me to understand that Kirk believes that many gods worked in concert to design the human form, and therefore Kirk Cameron is a polytheistic Pagan.
Interspersed with Kirk’s proclamation of Paganism (I’m so proud) is Bill telling Kirk how he had Richard Dawkins on and they debated The Big Bang Theory. Bill proudly announces that he won because he told this dude “You cannot explain to me how the world, the Earth, got here. You don’t have it. You can blather all day long, but you don’t have it.” So, he was debating a theory that says BANG! The Earth is here** and saying that it can’t be proven and yet he states as fact that God created the earth basically like this: BAM! The Earth is here. Do you see the difference there? Yeah, his way is BAM and the other way is BANG. Way to put that guy in his place, Bill! You are the man.
But let’s go back to Kirk.
“Darwin said in order to prove evolution, which is the number one alternative to God, you have to be able to prove transitional forms- one animal transitioning into another. And all through the fossil record and life we don’t find one of these:….”
Here my new buddy Kirk holds up a picture of:
All the while he’s declaring “There is no one animal transitioning into another.” (I will refrain from pointing out obvious one very obvious example of evolution just because Kirk and I are so united here).
Oh, Kirk, Kirk, you were doing so well. I just have one question for you, dear guy:
Note to Bill: Declaring that someone cannot prove to you that the world just appeared out of nowhere (huh?) does not make you a debate winner. Sorry, old man. You still suck.
* Did I mention I suck at transcription? Yeah, I do. I might look up a transcript later, though.
** Very simplistic, I realize. But I hate science. OK?
Related posts: